Brooklyn Public Library is honored to host Zora Neale Hurston's masterpiece, Their Eyes Were Watching God. This book has also been selected for The Big Read campaign -- an initiative of the National Endowment for the Arts, with the intent of revitalizing the role of literary reading in American popular culture. The initiative's purpose is to bring people together to read one great American classic at the same time, to better understand through discussion how its themes are still alive and relevant today. Throughout the month of March, book talks and movie screenings will be held in branch libraries all across Brooklyn.
Here, we welcome and invite you to the online discussion of Their Eyes. Together we will explore the novel through various critical, creative and literary perspectives and discover its many complex, latent and manifest meanings.
We begin with the biographical perspective and will look at some of the salient aspects of author's life such as class, race, birthplace, ethnicity, education, sex, gender, language, family history, spiritual values and political persuasions--and discern how they illuminate our reading and interpretation of the work.
Zora Neale Hurston was born on January 7, 1891 in Notasulga, Alabama, the fifth of eight children. Her mother died in 1904 when Hurston was thirteen, causing dramatic and unexpected changes in her life. She recalls the events surrounding her mother’s death: “That hour began my wanderings. Not so much in geography, but in time. Then not so much in time as in spirit.” Her father quickly remarried, and Hurston discovered an "adversary" in his new wife. Because of the conflict with her stepmother, Hurston left home at the age of fourteen. She moved to her brother’s house and took care for his children, and was able to continue her education, thanks to her brother's financial aid.
Hurston arrived in New York City in 1925, and played an active role in the Harlem Renaissance along with her friend Langston Hughes. Soon after her arrival in New York City, she received a scholarship to attend Barnard College where she studied Cultural Anthropology under the famous anthropologist Franz Boas, who later influenced much of her anthropological research. Boas is also renowned for arguing that the notions of race are culturally constructed and politically sustained, and that skin color does not suggest innate differences. Boas not only inspired Hurston’s work in anthropology but also supported her trip back to Eatonville to conduct formal folklore research. While studying at Barnard, Hurston worked as a secretary for Fannie Hurst who later wrote Imitation of Life, a story of a black woman passing as white.
Some critics have claimed that in Their Eyes, Hurston embodies much of her own chaotic and creative emotional life in the character of her protagonist--the passionate, restless and rebellious, Janie Crawford. Both Hurston and Janie, left their hometowns and what was left of their families. And both became wanderers. Hurston explains it through Janie: “…sittin’ still worries me. Ah wants tuh utilize mahself all over.”
In the words of critic Yvonne Johnson, Their Eyes is “the first self-conscious effort by an American ethnic writer to simultaneously subvert patriarchal discourse and to give voice to women of color.” But Hurston’s life has been surrounded by questions and controversy as she was not without "ambivalence." Hurston continued throughout her life to make, what another critic Mary Helen Washington called "unorthodox and paradoxical assertions on racial issues." It is not without some reason that Maya Angelou once wrote : “It is difficult, if not impossible, to find and touch the real Zora Neale Hurston.”
In her last years, Hurston moved back to Eatonville, Florida where she worked as a newspaper journalist, substitute teacher and finally as a domestic servant. Her several books were out of print and she was beset by an incapacitating poverty. She continued to write, published three short stories in the early 1950s and worked on a final novel, The Life of Herod the Great. She never completed her final novel, as she sank into a major depression. She suffered a stroke in 1959, and died in a nursing home on January 28, 1960 and was buried in an unmarked grave.
In August, 1973, Alice Walker, who described Hurston as her literary "foremother," traveled to Florida to locate Hurston’s unmarked grave. She had a marker placed on the spot that was most likely Huston’s grave, and then dedicated herself to calling attention to Hurston’s genius. Through Walker’s efforts, Hurston’s work received the critical acclaim that it deserves.
Hurston’s creative and complex life story is contained in her three major works: her “official” autobiography, Dust Tracks on a Road; her famous anthropological work, Mules and Men; and her acknowledged masterpiece Their Eyes Were Watching God. Her books are now back in print, and being taught in university literature courses. Also, Eatonville, Florida is now home to the annual Zora Neale Hurston festival. As Palahniuk said so well, "We all die. The goal is not to live forever, the goal is to create something that will." Zora Neale Hurston certainly did.
Following are some questions from various literary perspectives that will lead us deeper into the text and its context. We hope to explore them here in the course of our month long discussion of Their Eyes Were Watching God.
1. Are facts about the writer's life relevant to your understanding of the work?
2. Are characters and incidents in the work versions of writer's own experiences? Are they treated factually or imaginatively?
3. How do you think the writer's values are reflected in the work?
1. How do various elements of the work--plot, character, point of view, setting, tone, diction, images, metaphors, symbols, and so on--reinforce its meanings?
2. How are the elements related to the whole?
3. What issues does the work raise?
1. How does the work reflect the author's personal psychology?
2. What do the characters’ emotions and behavior reveal about their psychological states? What types of personalities are they?
3. Are psychological matters such as repressions and desires presented consciously or unconsciously by the author?
1. How does the work reflect the period in which it is written?
2. What literary or historical influences helped to shape the form and content of the work?
3. How important is the historical context to interpreting the work?
1. How are the class differences presented in the work? Are the characters aware or unaware of the economic and social forces that affect their lives?
2. How do economic conditions determine the characters' lives? Does the work challenge or affirm the social order it describes?
3. What ideological values are explicit or implicit in the work?
New Historicist Questions:
1. What kind of documents outside the work seem especially relevant for shedding light on the work?
2. How are social values contemporary to the work reflected or refuted in the work?
3. How does your historical moment affect your reading of the work and its historical reconstruction?
Cultural Studies Questions:
1. What does the work reveal about the cultural behavior contemporary to it?
2. How does popular culture contemporary to the work reflect or challenge the values implicit or explicit in the work?
3. What kind of cultural documents contemporary to the work add to your reading of it?
4. How do your own cultural assumptions affect your reading of the work and the culture contemporary to it?
Gender Studies Questions:
1. How are the lives of men and women portrayed in the work? Do the men and women in the work accept or reject these roles?
2. Is the form and content of the work influenced by the author's gender?
3. What attitudes are explicit or implicit in 'unconventional' relationships? Are these relationships sources of conflict? Do they provide resolution to conflicts?
1. How does the story use symbols?
2. Are archetypes presented, such as quests, initiations, scapegoats, withdrawals or returns?
3. Do the characters undergo any kind of transformation such as a movement from innocence to experience that seems archetypal?
4. Do any specific allusions to myths shed light on the text?
1. How are contradictory or opposing meanings expressed in the work?
2. How does meaning breakdown or deconstruct itself in the language of the text?
3. Would you say that ultimate definitive meanings are impossible to determine and establish in the text? Why? How does that affect your interpretation?
4. How are implicit ideological values revealed in the work?
1. How do you respond to the work emotionally?
2. Do you respond in the same way to the work after more than one reading?
3. What is the work's original or intended audience? To what extent are you similar to or different from that audience?